Here is an item that makes absolutely no sense. I am not talking about the writer, but the way all these high and mighty celebs are reacting and commenting about the Polanski rape. And we can add to the senseless, the stupid remarks defending this pile of fecal matter. It is amazing to see who can out idiot the last idiot in defending an admitted pedophile.
How many years have we been hearing rape is always rape anytime the woman says no? I have lost track, but I whole-heartedly agree that no means no. So the new morality says it is OK to get 13 year-olds drunk and drugged, then use and abuse their bodies any way that pleases a middle aged pervert? It must be so because this IS what they are saying.
In case the neo-moralists below don’t get you ticked off enough, there was a whole bunch more of them Hollyweirds muck-mucks that got a petition to defend what I guess is one of their own. One line of defense they offered was that Polanski has suffered enough, and they cite the fact that his wife Sharon Tate was brutally murdered without mercy.
I’ll grant you the part that said Tate was horribly killed without mercy, but pervert Polanski did his own merciless deed AFTER his wife was dead. What mercy was present when this human depravity was raping a 13 year old? The answer is none. I don’t picture he was merely missing his wife.
And I could not help but notice the list of “film-makers” that signed a petition demanding perv-boy’s release. Some of those on the list have portrayed some pretty sleazy excuses for films, so that may explain why they feel for what must be one of their own. I read that Woody Allen was among the defenders. Say, was that not the guy that was having sex with his own step-daughter? I guess they don’t call that incest any more either if it was not an actual blood relationship. He never went to jail either come to think of it.
I would like a reality check please. The inmates appear to be running the asylum! The sad thing is that I can think of actual inmates in prison with better morals than what I see here.
Veritas Vos Liberabit,
Gill Rapoza
=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Roman Polanski Deserves No Mercy?
By Geoff Metcalf
September 24, 2009
NewsWithViews.com
http://www.newswithviews.com/metcalf/metcalf294.htm
“When a person has been found guilty of rape he should be castrated.”—Billy Graham
Susan Estrich is right, “Roman Polanski deserves no mercy,” and Whoopie Goldberg is way (off the charts) wrong.
Bloviating on ‘The View’ Whoopie said, “I know it wasn’t rape-rape. I think it was something else, but I don’t believe it was rape-rape.” WHAT!?!? Are her corn rows too tight? Is she out of her flipping mind? What la-la land classification of rape or the most basic etymological definition is unclear? “Rape-rape”? That exceeds even the epically arrogant parsing of what the word “is is” by Bill Clinton. BULLFEATHERS!
Read full article here: http://www.newswithviews.com/metcalf/metcalf294.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment