When  Utopianism Is Shattered By Reality
by Tim  Case
March 29,  2010
“You may not be interested in war, but war is  interested in you.” 
“In a country where the sole employer is the  State, opposition means death by slow starvation. The old principle: Who does  not work shall not eat, has been replaced by a new one: Who does not obey shall  not eat.”
~ Leon Trotsky  (1879–1940)
What sort of  national leader persecutes the people within the nation he rules? That question  can be answered in part by asking another question: Which Emperors led Rome in  persecuting Christians? Serious students of Roman history are taught that it was  under those Emperors which historians consider the “good” Emperors that  Christians had the most to fear. Why? The answer resides in the assumption that  the “good” Emperors were those men whose overriding concern was for the welfare  of the Empire. 
On the other  hand “bad” Emperors placed most of their time and attention on their own  hedonistic pleasures while caring little or nothing for the Empire’s security,  or its economic problems.
Marcus  Aurelius (A.D. 161–180) was considered one such “good” Emperor and was  proclaimed a great Stoic philosopher for his composition “Meditations.” As  such, he was, in the beginning, respected by a number of Christian communities.  That is until the Empire began having serious problems.
In 162 A.D.  Rome faced a devastating famine which had resulted from a noteworthy deluge of  the Tiber River. This flood had destroyed a significant portion of Rome, left  fields unusable, and drowned cattle. On the heels of the Tiber flood the empire  experienced earthquakes, a series of fires, then plagues of  insects.
These events,  understandably, began to unnerve the populations in the various affected  provinces. The people’s discontent took the form of questioning: “Why have the  ancient Roman gods allowed this to happen to us?” “Who is to blame for our  misfortunes?” 
The local  governors, faced with the growing discontent of terrified and dispirited  populations seeking an appropriate scapegoat, settled on the upstart Christian  communities. This resulted in “new” decrees (Eusebius; Church History  IV.26.5) being issued around the year 162 AD blaming the Christian  communities for the Roman’s travails.
The problems  faced by the emperor and the empire were compounded when the legions in Britain  sought to persuade their general, Statius Priscus, to declare himself emperor  and march on Rome. Further tribulations came with the uprising of the Parthians  under Vologaeses III. Roman forces commanded by Serverianus were annihilated at  the battle of Elegia in Cappadocia (presently eastern central Turkey) allowing  the Parthians to overwhelm and occupy Syria. 
Lucius Verus,  the adopted son of Emperor Hadrian and co-regent with Marcus Aurelius, was  considered a man of great courage with superior leadership abilities and as such  it was decided he should be the commander which would contest the Parthian  rebellion. Verus, however, had a problem. His luxurious lifestyle, gambling and  a beauty by the name of Panthea – described as “low-born girl-friend” – along  with various other “debaucheries” put the Armenian campaign and possibly the  empire in peril. 
Lucius,  however, was blessed with very capable generals. Because of these generals the  Parthian War was favorably concluded when the Parthian leader, Vologases IV,  sued for peace then ceded western Mesopotamia to the Romans in late 164 or early  165 AD. It had taken nearly half the decade but the Romans finally had something  to cheer over. 
On Lucius’  return to Rome he was rewarded with a parade of triumph. The cheers of victory,  however, were short lived because the returning military also brought with them  a catastrophic disease. The whole Roman Empire was going to face and deal with  what historians call the Antonine Plague. 
This plague,  whether small pox or measles, would ravage the empire for some fifteen years,  take the lives of Emperor Lucius Verus in 169 AD, his co-regent Marcus Aurelius  in 180 AD along with an estimated five million people throughout the Roman  Empire. It would also twist the Romans’ social and economic world into a monster  of Biblical proportions.
The Antonine  plague turned once thriving prosperous towns and villages from Persia to the  Rhine into ghost towns. With a decimated population the empire’s economy  teetered on ruin, yet taxes were increased to support greater military spending  and an overstuffed bureaucracy. Huge “donations” of grain were stolen from the  remaining farms to support the troops as well as the hungry in the large  population centers, including Rome. Romans were saddled with land taxes, every  imaginable property tax, occupation taxes, and poll taxes. Almost every attempt  to be a productive citizen of the Roman Empire was  penalized.
In the words  of the 19th century historian Barthold Georg Niebuhr  this plague during “the reign of M. Aurelius forms a turning point in so many  things, and above all in literature and art, I have no doubt that this crisis  was brought about by that plague... The ancient world never recovered from the  blow inflicted on it by the plague which visited it in the reign of M.  Aurelius.”
Adding to the  suffering of the Roman people, weakened armies were sent to deal with Britons  who threatened to revolt, barbarian tribes beyond the Alps looking to invade  Italy and the ever seditious, unrepentant Parthians. 
To the Roman  people it must have seemed to have been the end of the world. The Roman hubris  of invincibility which had prevailed during the years of Pax Romana (Roman  peace) was now forever gone. No longer could the gluttonous and smug upper  class, along with the corrupt and vile urban masses which had been appeased  through imperial gratuities, punctuated with blood-drenched public games,  pretend that everything in the Roman world was working in perfect harmony.  
The once  civilized Romans now actively turned their anger on the Christians, who they  deemed responsible for every calamity the empire experienced. Ancient  “tattletale” law concerning perjury was set aside to the point that Christian  apologists were alarmed. (For an example of this ancient Roman law see 9.8.3.)  
Clement of  Alexandria writes: “For the shameless informers and coveters of the property of  others, taking occasion from the decrees, openly carry on robbery night and day,  despoiling those who are guilty of no wrong.”
All appeals  to the emperor for justice fell on deaf ears; Christian blood was now to flow  freely in many parts of the empire. The populations of the Roman Empire were to  see, in all the accompanying death and misery visited on the Christian  communities, justification that indeed, the Roman gods had been angered because  the empire had tolerated Christianity. So the cry of the Roman masses  Christianos ad leonem (Throw the Christians to the lions) continued  unabated.
To be fair  the Romans did offer Christians a means of escape, if they would only swear  allegiance and offer incense to the Emperor they would be allowed to continue  living. Those who didn’t? Well, they were immediately declared disloyal traitors  who were planning to revolt against the empire. 
The  Christians’ refusal to be broken was a continuing bewilderment to Aurelius and  the Romans, but ultimately their defiance was the very thing that saved  them.
The previous  account of Roman society during the reign of Marcus Aurelius shows clearly what  can occur in any closely structured collective when that society comes under  extreme stress. We all would like to believe we would never partake in wholesale  murder, theft, or carnage as the Romans did. Only “evil” people do such things  and “we” would never cross that line.
The Romans,  in desperation, looked for and found a scapegoat. Yet, we witness, and then  excuse, the same process when our national interests or national security are  deemed threatened by an external or internal foe and many times on the slimmest  of evidence or a plethora of state sponsored  propaganda.
A case in  point was the dehumanization of the German population in America and fear they were subjected to  starting in 1915.
The  dehumanization of those thought to be the problem or threat, will transform what  had been ordinary, normal people into indifferent or actively willful  participants in the most hideous crimes. It also causes otherwise loving mothers  to wrap their sons in the flag and send them to war. Simply, mass fear causes  otherwise rational, reasonable people to respond irrationally. The need to  “conform” becomes mindless, brute conformity; we are no different than the  ancient Romans and are subject to the same influences.
Recently I  read a most interesting article written by Glenn Harlan Reynolds. In Consent  of the governed – and the lack thereof Mr. Reynolds points out that “only 21  percent of American voters believe that the federal government enjoys the  consent of the governed.” This is contrasted by a poll in which it was  discovered that a “full 63 percent of the ‘political class’ believe that the  government enjoys the consent of the governed.” 
With 79  percent of those polled believing that there is no consent giving the federal  government the right to rule; coupled with a continuing and ultimate economic  catastrophe; unprecedented federal intrusion into the people’s personal lives;  unparalleled political malfeasance; extortion; increasing social unrest with the  rising specter of civil war, Americans should be concerned that their government  maintains its rule only from a position of brute force. Here I presume that the  remaining 37 percent of the political class feel secure in their despotism.  
However,  before we resort to the sharpening then brandishing of the long knives let us  step back and see where we are today in the scheme of things. There is always  enough time to fight but the time for reasoning and preparing may be far more  precious and limited.
Ultimately we  as humans want to be responsible for the safety and security of our families and  communities. We take this responsibility willingly and because it is crucial;  but to accomplish it we must survive the onslaught of powerful counterproductive  forces. As such it is appropriate that the word survive contains the very  essence of what is needed.
Size up the  situation
Are we in  imminent or immediate danger? If not, then what must be done or acquired to  prepare for future possibilities? If we are in danger what response is morally  justified and will assure the safety of our loved ones and others in our  group?
Are we being  manipulated? 
For an  intriguing discussion of free market thinking and why it is so productive, I  highly recommend a wonderful little book by Tom Baugh. In Starving the Monkeys  Mr. Baugh lays out the case for free market economics in a manner that is easy  to read and rife with personal experiences.
If you  enjoyed Atlas  Shrugged you will find in Mr. Baugh gives an up-to-date and no-nonsense  “examination of the problems, and solutions that are more practical than hoping  to run away to a prepared Galt’s Gulch retreat or community.”  
Beyond this  Mr. Baugh gives the reader sound reasoning for a solid education in math and the  physical sciences with practical means of resisting government influences. Mr.  Baugh is not interested in telling you what to think but seeing that you have  the tools to make good rational and ultimately life saving  decisions.
What is the  psychology and methodology of those forces arrayed against  us?
The human  capacity for evil, as seen above, is almost limitless. The psychology behind  conformity to immoral social pressures is fully explored in Philip Zimbardo’s  book, “The  Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil.” Mr. Zimbardo also  gives an excellent discussion on heroism and how ordinary people can  successfully resist the powers of a cruel out-of-control  system.
Don’t bet for  a moment this country is immune to the ravages of “good” people.  
Undue Haste will be  disastrous
Don’t allow  irrational fear or anger to be the driving force in your actions. Conserve your  resources and energy until you know what must be done then move quickly.  
I was  interested how the economic law of scarcity came into focus during Gerald  Celente’s recent experience during the earthquake in Chile. Mr. Celente recounts  that he “bolted from bed, put on his pants, slipped on his shoes, grabbed his  jacket and ran for the stairwell.”
He goes on to  report his thoughts were “get out of the hotel before it collapsed. Nothing else  counted. Personal possessions (passports, wallets, money, watches) became  instant nonessentials. When it comes to life  and death, the only things to leave behind are everything.” (Emphasis  mine)
Mr. Celente  took exactly what was needed and moved quickly to find the scarcity of  safety.
Unless there  is an immediate need (as in the case of an earthquake, or a medical emergency)  to move or act, energy and resources are precious and time of less  importance.
Resist –  Remember who and where you are
Take stock of  yourself. Are the actions of the group rational and consistent with your own  moral code? If not then find others who will be supportive. A good support group  can make all the difference in your survival. If you are in a group where there  is dissension; get out. The infighting and bickering will only get worse as the  stress on the group increases.
Even though  those second-century Christians were armed they refused to fight. Why? As a  small community within the Roman Empire, they knew it was futile and would only  lead to more deaths within their own ranks. The simple principle is that without  the majority supporting an armed rebellion it is doomed to fail and the Roman  population was in no mood to support anyone.
Have an  escape plan in place and be prepared to use it. 
Vanquish Fear and  Panic
I have no  idea how many have lost their lives because their emotions overrode their common  sense.
Recently, I  received an email from a friend in which he noted that in an emergency (a fire  for example) in a public building, where a large crowd is present, the majority  of dead will be found at the front door. I have since found out that under life  and death stress most will egress a building by the same route they entered. In  short, don’t follow the herd.
In the event  of social chaos, panic and fear will be lessened by family, friends and  faith.
Improvise
No matter  what the emergency you won’t have everything you need. Look around you; you will  be surprised what is available to help you.
Value  Living
No matter  what occurs don’t give in to pessimism or defeatism. Shun those people like the  plague. 
Essential  skills
Learn and  train yourself in skills which you feel are indispensable; especially those  things, which at present, someone else has to do for you.  
Learn how to  barter and trade value for value. 
This is by no  means an extensive list and it should be expanded, but use it as a good starting  point. 
We are  already witness to the dehumanization of those who are opposed to the present  administration and its agenda. It is only going to get worse. Everything you put  into place now will be to your advantage later.
Contrary to  the beliefs of some, we don’t have to suffer the fate of those second-century  Christians. 
For far too  long we have allowed ourselves to be deluded into thinking that Americans would  always be free; that guaranteed “checks and balances” within government would  never allow to occur what we witnessed over the last few weeks with the “health  care” monstrosity. Reality has finally assaulted our idealistic fantasies, now  the devil wants his due. 
Oh, and don’t  bet that Leon Trotsky was wrong on either of his points; I guarantee you will  lose the bet.
I opened this  article with this question. “What sort of national leader persecutes the people  within the nation he rules?” I’ll wager you already knew the  answer.
Tim Case [send him mail] is a 30-year  student of the ancient histories who agrees with the first-century stoic  Epictetus on this one point: “Only the educated are  free.”
Copyright © 2010 by  LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted,  provided full credit is given.
Gill  Rapoza
Veritas Vos  Liberabit

No comments:
Post a Comment