Hello Everyone,
I have noticed more of these types of laws coming  along in a handful of states.  I wonder  if those that are getting these bills into state laws are doing it just because  the feds are overbearing (and they are), or because they think something  brewing, or a little of both?  I am only  speculating at this point.  No problem  here with their actions for which ever is the  reason.
Godspeed,
Gill Rapoza
Veritas Vos Liberabit
Wyoming  Governor Signs Sovereignty Resolution
by Michael Boldin
10 Mar, 2010
This week, Wyoming Governor Dave Freudenthal signed  House Joint Resolution 2 (HJ0002), claiming “sovereignty on behalf of the State  of Wyoming and for its citizens under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of  the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the  federal government or reserved to the people by the Constitution of the United  States.”
Freudenthal, a long-time Democrat, was previously a US  attorney for the Clinton administration, and is currently serving his 2nd term  as Governor of Wyoming. He endorsed Barack Obama for president and is commonly  referred to as one of the most popular governors in the country.  
In a memorandum sent to the Wyoming legislature in  late January, Freudenthal made clear his position that the federal government  has gone beyond the limits of the constitution:
“For decades we have  shared increased frustration dealing with the federal government and its  agencies. What started out as a leak in the erosion of state prerogative and  independence has today turned into a flood. From wolf and grizzly bear  management, to gun control, to endless regulation and unfunded mandates – the  federal government has become far too powerful and intrusive.”  
Once brought to a vote this year, the legislature  showed little opposition to sending a notice to D.C. that the federal government  is overstepping its constitutional authority. The Senate passed it by a vote of  26-4 and the House by a vote of 56-4.
Notice And  Demand
These non-binding resolutions, often called “state  sovereignty resolutions” do not carry the force of law. Instead, they are  intended to be a statement of the legislature of the state. They play an  important role, however.
For example, if you owned an apartment building and  had a tenant not paying rent, you wouldn’t show up with an empty truck to kick  them out without first serving notice. That’s how we view these Resolutions – as  serving “notice and demand” to the Federal Government to “cease and desist any  and all activities outside the scope of their constitutionally-delegated  powers.” Follow-up, of course, is a must.
House Joint Resolution 2 includes language to this  effect:
That this resolution  serve as notice and demand to the federal government, as our agent, to cease and  desist, effective immediately, from enacting mandates that are beyond the scope  of these constitutionally delegated powers. The state of Wyoming will not  enforce such mandates. [emphasis  added]
Wyoming joins 10 other states that have passed similar  resolutions since last year; Alaska, Idaho, North Dakota, South Dakota,  Oklahoma, Louisiana, and Tennessee passed theirs in 2009, and Utah, Alabama, and  South Carolina have joined Wyoming in passing resolutions this  year.
A Growing  Movement
These resolutions are part of a growing grassroots  movement in state legislatures across the country as a protest to the intrusion  of the federal government into state government affairs, and is an essential  first step towards efforts to push back, or nullify, unconstitutional federal  laws and regulations.
Supporters of such legislation point to laws passed by  other states that take the next step – and work to nullify specific federal laws  seen as unconstitutional by the state. Fourteen states have now defied  federal laws on marijuana. Two dozen  states have refused to comply with the Bush-era Real ID Act, rendering that  2005 law virtually null and void today. The legislatures in both Virginia and  Arizona have passed legislation effectively nullifying a national health care  plan within their borders. Three states have already signed a “Firearms Freedom  Act” into law, and Governor Freudenthal is expected to sign HB95 to make Wyoming  the fourth.
Resolutions, guns, national ID cards, and weed might  be just the early stages of a quickly growing movement to nullify other federal  laws seen as outside the scope of their constitutionally-delegated powers. In  states around the country this year, bills have been proposed to defy or nullify  federal laws on health  care, use  of national guard troops overseas, legal  tender laws, cap and  trade, and even the process of collecting  federal income taxes.
The final goal? It’s a long way off – a federal  government that follows the strict limits of the constitution, whether it wants  to or not.
Note: Thanks to Brenda of WyomingWatchdogs.com for helping with  this report.
Michael Boldin [send him email] is the founder  of the Tenth Amendment Center
Copyright © 2010 by  TenthAmendmentCenter.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly  granted, provided full credit is given.
Gill  Rapoza
Veritas Vos  Liberabit

No comments:
Post a Comment